Friday 23 October 2009

Wednesday 21 October 2009

GCSE Film Studies : Coursework





For an excellent illustrated timeline on the history of vampires in movies go to :

GCSE Film Studies : Film Education Cinema Visit 29/10/09



From
December 27, 2007

The Kite Runner



Marc Forster’s magnificent film The Kite Runner hinges on a secret that has haunted the hero since his childhood in Afghanistan. Amir is a successful young novelist living in San Francisco. A phone call from a dying man rips us back to the dusty streets of Kabul in 1978. Two young boys are winning a kite-fighting contest that involves slicing through the opponent’s string. The losing kite is then claimed by the first child to chase it down. Amir’s best friend Hassan has an uncanny knack of knowing exactly where the kite will fall.

But an act of unspeakable brutality inflicted on Hassan down an empty side-street poisons the profound bond between the two boys. Amir witnesses Hassan being raped by the local bully but is too cowardly to help. He shamefully pretends he saw nothing. Hassan is too fond of Amir to question his word. How easily and insidiously guilt turns to hate.

Forster’s film is a rare canvas among Hollywood studio productions. It is an exemplary piece of storytelling ripped quite beautifully from Khaled Hosseini’s famous book. But what distinguishes the film is a backdrop of raw and ruinous cultural events. Amir’s falling-out with Hassan is silhouetted against Afghanistan’s shocking slide into chaos. Kabul in 1978 is a thriving metropolis where privileged and upstanding men of honour such as Amir’s father, Baba (a command performance by Homayoun Ershadi), can drink whisky and talk freely.

When the grown-up Amir (Khalid Abdalla) returns to the capital in 2000 to atone for his past, the country is a splintered mess: sacked by the Soviets and driven into the dirt by the Taleban. The last harrowing half of the film is a grim and hair-raising thriller with public stonings, amputees who sell their crutches for scraps, and ghastly orphanages routinely sourced for sex by the Taleban.

The film’s only weakness is that the twists and improbable coincidences are almost too melodramatic for their own good. But this is quibbling. The Kite Runner is an enthralling piece of cinema. The performances are note perfect; in some cases sublime. Ahmad Khan Mahmidzada, who plays the young Hassan – the most sinned-against character in the film – is an extraordinary find. He can’t be much older than 12, yet his crumpled, sombre face has a wisdom that belies his years.


A Level Media Studies : TransAmerica

Transamerica

A film review by Chris Barsanti - Copyright © 2006 Filmcritic.com

From the moment that Felicity Huffman comes on screen inTransamerica, with her rumbling voice and the cloistered manners of a 1950s housewife, it’s apparent you’re in for something rarely seen before in American film. Playing the transsexual Bree, who is getting ready for the final gender reassignment surgery that will complete her transition to true womanhood, Huffman creates a character who isn’t terribly interested in gender politics but just wants to be allowed to live on her own terms. As such, it’s a brave and tough piece of acting – a woman playing a man aching to become a woman – that truly breaks barriers. Unfortunately, there’s a lousy movie wrapped around her that one must suffer through to see her.

Conceived by writer/director Duncan Tucker as the kind of wacky road movie being churned out by Sundance-grubbing indie studios about 10 years ago, Transamerica has a strong conception of Bree’s character but little idea of what to do with it. Living in a small, rundown house and working two jobs to save money, Bree puts all her hopes and dreams into her long-awaited surgery, doing everything she can to convince her therapist (Elizabeth Peña) that she’s ready for the change. All that gets put on hold, though, when she finds out that a relationship she had back when she was still living as a man resulted in a child, Toby (Kevin Zegers, hardly up to the task), now a teen runaway calling from a New York jail looking for his dad. Since her therapist won’t consent to the surgery until she deals with her past, Bree hops a plane to New York. That’s where the road trip comes in.

Tucker has obviously done his homework on this subculture, showing in well-detailed terms how these people in transition from one gender to the gender live out their daily lives. There’s no question but that he has presented here an affectionate portrait of the often-misunderstood, going out of his way to show Bree as a true woman who only needs the surgery so that she can finally feel at peace in her own body. It’s with everything else in the film that Tucker runs into trouble.

The bulk of Transamerica is made up of the desperately madcap adventures which Toby and Bree get into on the road from New York to L.A. – where he hopes to break into porn stardom. Everything here, from Bree’s last-minute decision to hide her true identity from Toby (she pretends she’s a missionary) to an excruciating section with Bree’s parents, works barely as comedy and even less well as drama. A woefully short highlight is when the two run into Calvin, a good old boy who gets a crush on Bree. Played with endearing warmth by the masterful Graham Greene, Calvin has a rambling ease missing from the rest of the film, his too-brief scenes finally giving Huffman someone of similar caliber to play against. This sort of critical misjudgment is typical of this crushingly dull film which practically hides Huffman’s breakthrough performance behind a wall of Indie Screenwriting 101 clichés.

The DVD (packaged in one of the freakiest "magic motion" sleeves ever, in which Huffman morphs into Bree before your eyes) includes commentary track, behind-the-scenes featurette, and two interviews.


Monday 19 October 2009

A Level Media : The Wrestler


The Wrestler is a film that Mickey Rourke has been waiting to star in for most of his acting career. It’s a film about failure, loneliness, knowing that the best years of one’s life have long passed. Even in Rourke’s youth, when he blazed so fiercely and beautifully in Body Heat (1981), Rumblefish (1983) and Year of the Dragon (1985) he always had a rueful look in his eyes, as if he had caught sight of his destiny, as if he knew he could keep it at bay for only a while.

By the middle of the 1990s he was living that future. He had been arrested for spousal abuse. His decision to take up professional boxing had lost him his looks and, to judge from his slow and sometimes slurred voice on chat shows, part of his brain. His once shining career had sunk to such a level that he was reduced to sharing screen time with the likes of Jean-Claude Van Damme and Dennis Rodman in Double Team (1998).

In recent years, he has been virtually MIA, a John Travolta figure waiting for his own Quentin Tarantino to come along and restore his reputation. Actually, he was offered a part in Pulp Fiction (1994) – that of Butch Coolidge; after he turned it down, it went to Bruce Willis, an actor who has made his fortune by refining a lightweight, vanilla-flavoured version of the persona that Rourke has lived out for ruinous real.

Darren Aronofksy, a director making a comeback of his own after he followed his critically-esteemed Pi (1998) and Requiem For A Dream (2000) with the commercially unsuccessful The Fountain (2006), has pulled off something of a coup. Not only has he hauled Rourke from his self-pitying slump, but, working from a screenplay written by Robert D Siegel, he has created an often-brutal, always-compelling portrait of a decent man trying to peel himself off Skid Row.

Rourke plays Robin Ramzinski, known to older wrestling fans as Randy (the Ram) Robinson. He was at his peak back in the 1980s, a decade in which the hair metal music he loves was still popular. Now his body is criss-crossed with scars; he relies on painkillers and steroids to keep him in the ring; he fights in small-town venues picking up fees that barely cover the rent on his trailer-park home in Jersey. He hasn’t seen his daughter Stephanie (Evan Rachel Wood) for many years.

The Wrestler is less hyperactive than Aronofsky’s earlier films. It’s designed to resemble a documentary and achieves its goal of looking crummy so successfully that viewers may feel they’re taking a holiday in a dirty refrigerator. The pervasive, wheezy grottiness highlights the Ram’s fall from his former glories, and also captures the daily reality of most wrestlers’ lives.

And yet, in spite of all the grot and the poor money, and even after a younger opponent uses a staple gun on Ram that leads to him having a heart attack, the appeal of “grapple” never wanes. Randy is addicted to the ritual of fighting. He prefers its choreographed violence to the messiness of his personal life. Its “family” – of fellow wrestlers, of devoted spectators – is easier to handle than his real one. Unlike Cassidy (Marisa Tomei), his favourite stripper, he’s devoted to performing; he can’t imagine a life in which he can’t enjoy the fix of being “the Ram”.

The fight scenes are handled with a sweaty, bloodied intensity that makes them far less aesthetically appealing or even dramatic than Raging Bull or Rocky. Even when the Ram wins, the poundings he takes and the slowness with which he hobbles back to his dressing room mean that it’s hard to feel any pleasure or joy. We stare at Rourke and can’t help but wonder what wretched depths of personal experience he is mining.

And yet, even when he’s at his weariest and most beleaguered, there’s still the hint of a smile, both rueful and sexy, that seduces us. There’s also evidence of that comic talent that his tough-man reputation has always obscured: the scenes in which he does overtime at a deli counter – wearing a name tag that says “Robin” while his blond extensions are wrapped in a hair net; scooping egg mayonnaise into plastic tubs and slicing ham for elderly customers - are poignantly delightful.

The Wrestler doesn’t get everything right. The Ram’s relationship with Cassidy, while it does have the benefit of showcasing 44-year-old Tomei’s extraordinary body, feels almost as programmatic as his encounters with Stephanie. The film doesn’t – and maybe as a sports film, can’t – take us anywhere very surprising.

Rating: ****

A Level Media Studies : This Is England


SYNOPSIS

This Is England is the story of a summer school holiday.It’s 1983 and school is out. Twelve-year-old Shaun(Thomas Turgoose) is an isolated lad growing up in a grim coastal town, whose father has died fighting in the Falklands War. Over the course of the summer holiday he finds fresh male role models when those in the local skinhead scene take him in. With his new friends Shaun discovers a world of parties, first love and the joys of Dr Marten boots. Here he meets Combo(Stephen Graham), an older, racist skinhead who has recently got out of prison. As Combo’s gang harass the local ethnic minorities, the course is set for a rite of passage that will hurl Shaun from innocence to experience.To get an overview of the film, go to www.filmeducation.org/thisisengland (STUDY GUIDE section) and watch CLIP 1.


THE GANG

Shane Meadows found many of the members of the skinhead gang through The CarltonTelevision Junior Workshop. Joe Gilgun was cast as Woody, the unofficial boss-man of the skinheads, who befriends Shaun after he has been bullied for wearing flares on his last day at school.In the key roles of Milky and Lol, Shane cast his old friends Andrew Shim and Vicky McClure who he worked with on A Room For Romeo Brass. Milky is the only black character in this film that deconstructs racist attitudes, while Lol is the leader of the girls.Stephen Graham who plays Combo, the catalyst for Shaun’s passage into adulthood, was one of the first people cast in This Is England. Stephen seemed perfectly placed physically and geographically to play the part of Combo, but he also brought a whole other layer of complexity to the role. His own background is in fact mixed race, and he drew on his confusion growing upto add depth to Combo’s back-story.The group dynamic in the film helps to progress the narrative and the groups combine a number of influences. Shaun’s relationship with his school provides an insight into the isolation that is a part of Shaun’s life. As Shaun walks home he meets Woody and his gang. We see the power struggle between Tubbs, Pukey and Shaun for Woody’s attention. Shaun is made to feel welcomed and his problems with the boys at school begin to disappear as Woody makes light of them and encourages Shaun to laugh at the situation.


COMPARING CHARACTERS

The biggest change that occurs to the dynamics of the group is the return of Combo.


ACTIVITY

What were your first impressions of this character? Contrast the two gang leaders, using two key scenes to support your points. Use these subheadings in your analysis for each character:

DRESS: Use of language / tone of voice

ATTITUDE TO SHAUN: Relationship to the other members of the group

SKINHEAD CULTURE: Woody and Combo are similar in terms of dress, however the way in which they behave is very different. The subculture that unites them is what it means to be a skinhead.


SKINHEADS

Today, racism, neo-nazism, thuggery, and all the other forms of anti-social behaviour associatedwith ‘skins’ have become the snap-judgments most people make. It wasn’t always like that. The original skinheads hailed from the late sixties. It began with Mods who were welcomed into the world of reggae clubs in London, such as Ruby’s on Carnaby Street. Here they discovered notonly Ska music, but the key style components that defined the original skinhead look. Theskinhead culture was taken up by black and white working class kids working in shipyards and on factory lines, who bonded over a love of reggae and forging a particular kind of English identity, with braces, suits, boots, and sometimes a Cromby hat atop heads shaved, military style. There was no peace and love for this lot, life was a series of hard knocks and this tough,fighter’s appearance was how they chose to express those truths.The second wave of skinheads, in the early eighties, were in one sense similar: just kids from council estates finding their place by being different together, like teenagers everywhere.Allegiance was now sworn to bands that acknowledged the heritage of Ska music, like Madness or The Specials. At the same time a new genre sprang up in punk infused Oi! Music, romperstomper,screwdriver tunes, charged for fighting. Dressed in Dr Martens and with heads shavedmilitary style, these kids would give the V to anyone foolish enough to give them the eye.


These were teens who came from areas of high unemployment looking for solidarity beyondThatcher’s ‘me’ culture. They were abandoned by society and that, of course, made them vulnerable to the advances of the National Front.As a second wave skinhead who had always been aware of the sixties legacy, Shane Meadows(director of This Is England) felt it was essential to create a balanced and truthful picture of the scene as he had experienced it. ‘The skinheads, because of their aggression and outward appearance, they’re almost soldier like, were I suppose almost handpicked to become soldiers for the National Front. You don’t see the contradiction that you’re being indoctrinated into theNational Front whilst listening to black music. When I first heard about the National Front, the picture that was painted to me was a Churchillian vision of Asian families rowing into the white cliffs of Dover on boats, and that skinheads would be on the beaches fighting to stop them entering the country. As a twelve-year-old kid that’s quite a romantic image. It’s almost like ‘what your granddad did.’’‘When you’re twelve and no one in your town can get a job, and someone comes up to you and says ‘these people are to blame’ it’s easy to believe,’ says Shane of the racism he encountered through skinheads. ‘I did for about three weeks, some people still believe that as adults and that’s frightening.’To capture the inherent contradictions of skinhead culture, Shane presents a motley crew of believable characters whose behaviour is often as farcical as it is threatening and disturbing.Combo, the racist gang leader has L plates on his car, for example. They are losers, but Shane never lets you forget that there is always a reason behind their behaviour.


KEY QUESTIONS

Think carefully about the last sentence of the paragraph above and this next quote from the film’s director Shane Meadows:‘It’s not to do with colour so much, it’s to do with identity and belonging.’Given factors like the high unemployment and the circumstances of their own lives (such as Shaun and Combo’s) can their actions be understood (although not condoned)?


MEADOWS AND MASCULINITY

One of the key themes in the film is masculinity. Earlier we looked at the oppositionalcharacteristics between Woody and Combo; both these characters offer very different representations of masculinity and we also see other versions presented in the film.Through the character of Shaun we see a number of factors come together that form part of his identity at that particular time, such as his relationship to his father, his relationship to the various members of the gang and how this manifests itself in terms of a sense of confidence and control over his life.


KEY QUESTIONS;

How much do you think the ways these issues are represented are gender specific? Can you imagine this same narrative if the lead character were a girl?Masculinity is a theme that has been returned to by the director Shane Meadows in this film.This theme is important to him on a personal level as a motivating force toward filmmaking, as well as being a theme we can see evidence of in his body of work.


Shane first hit on the idea for This Is England whilst working on his preceding film, Dead Man’s Shoes, a story of victimisation, abuse of power and revenge in rural England. It was a project that made the director reflect on the nature of bullying and violence. Specifically there was an incident from his own life, when he was about twelve-years-old and had become a skinhead,when as he explains:‘I thought the be all and end all in life was that kind of hard masculinity in men. I craved to belike a Jimmy Boyle, or a John McVicar, or a Kray. It’s like kids who are into Beckham, I was into Jimmy Boyle in the same way. I wanted to see men fight, and there was an act of violence thatI almost prompted, and that was something that became very difficult to live with.’Ironically it was this experience, alongside the example set by a figure like Jimmy Boyle, a criminal who became an artist, which ultimately became very influential for Shane in a positive way. Of his childhood in Uttoxeter in the eighties, then a small Midlands town with a population of around 10,000, high unemployment, and the epitome of Thatcher’s rural dispossessed, the director reflects:‘Coming from a town like Uttoxeter, nobody expects you to leave and become a filmmaker. In away my reaction to that act of violence was the first stepping stone to getting out of that way of life.’


KEY QUESTIONS;

Do you think the different aspects of masculinity that are shown through various charactersare realistic?; Can you relate to them?; Do you think that the boys and young men we meet in This Is England are under pressure toconform to a ‘hard masculinity’?; Do you think that these pressures are still prevalent?; Does the meaning of the phrase ‘what it means to be a man’ change as individuals get older?


IS THIS ENGLAND?

Throughout the film we see competing ideas of national identity. There is a version offered via Combo and later with his association with the National Front, this overtly political group offers solutions to the problems of unemployment and a sense of national pride based on exclusion.


ACTIVITY;

To work on the following activity, it is necessary to watch CLIP 2 – which can be viewed atwww.filmeducation.org/thisisengland (CLIP ANALYSIS section).; Looking at this short sequence and listening to the comment made by the producer, do youthink that Shaun can be described as racist?; Or can you see his motivation in a different way? Consider in particular his treatment of Mr Sandhu and the Asian boys playing football.The other version that we see is less overtly political, the gang prior to Combo’s arrival is arguably a more inclusive version, where the things that individuals have in common is what connects them.At the end of the film we see Shaun take the English flag, throw it into the sea and watch it slowly sink.


KEY QUESTIONS; How do the connotations of the flag change for Shaun?; What does the English flag mean to you?; Having looked at the film do you think that these associations have changed over time?; Does the flag have group specific association now?; Is the flag something to which you feel any kind of allegiance?; Where do these ideas/feelings come from?